Showing posts with label Campaigne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Campaigne. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Obama Throws 'Equal Pay' Stones from Glass House

There is no greater example of how phony and disingenuous the “war on women” rhetoric President Barack Obama and Democrats are using against Republicans this election cycle than the Obama Administration’s war on its female staffers in the White House.

Today is “National Equal Pay Day,” and Obama wrote a political proclamation in which he used the oft-cited figure that women make 77 percent of what males do and African-American and Hispanic women make 64 percent and 56 percent, respectively, of what men make.

The irony is, Obama says this to turn out working class and minority women voters to secure himself four more years in the White House, wherein he can continue to deny his female staffers “equal pay for equal work.” According to a study the Washington Free Beacon did of the salaries of White House staffers, women made 18 percent less than men did in Obama’s White House.
With that in mind, all of Obama’s words today ring extremely hollow.

In his presidential proclamation, Obama cited the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which extended the time period in which women could sue their employers for wages lost due to discrimination and mentioned that he created the “National Equal Pay Task Force” to identify equal pay violations.
One can only wonder if this task force examined his White House.

“On National Equal Pay Day, let us resolve to become a Nation that values the contributions of our daughters as much as those of our sons, denies them no opportunity, and sets no limits on their dreams,” Obama wrote. “I call upon all Americans to recognize the full value of women's skills and their significant contributions to the labor force, acknowledge the injustice of wage discrimination, and join efforts to achieve equal pay.”

Based on the Obama administration's unequal pay for female employees, one can wonder how much Obama values the “contributions of our daughters as much as those of our sons.”
Before he calls upon “all Americans to recognize” the “full value of women’s skills” and “acknowledge the injustice of wage discrimination,” he should first call upon his administration to do so and “join efforts to achieve equal pay” that he is calling others to join.

There has been a pattern of hostility toward women in Obama’s White House.
As the Los Angeles Times wrote in a story on Ron Suskind’s book about the Obama White House, “Confidence Men,” “One of the major disclosures in [the book] was that women working in the Obama White House often felt marginalized, that a frat-boy atmosphere that prevailed in the 2008 campaign carried over into 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.”

In Suskind’s book, Anita Dunn is quoted as saying, “looking back, this place would be in court for a hostile workplace. … Because it actually fit all of the classic legal requirements for a genuinely hostile workplace to women.’’

So when Obama writes on Equal Pay Day that “his Administration is committed to securing equal pay for equal work” and “working women are at the heart of an America built to last,” one can only wonder why the mainstream media does not point to his administration as an example of “equal pay for equal work” and his White House as representative of an America “built to last.”

Obama and Democrats will continue to use Sandra Flukes and contraception non-controversies to fuel their “war on women” talking point, even as their major surrogates like Hilary Rosen denigrate stay-at-home moms, in order to distract the electorate. They rely on these distractions because they are rightfully worried that women may not support him as strongly if his administration’s hypocritical actions toward the women who work for him received more sunlight.

17 Apr 2012

SOURCE: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/17/obama-throws-equal-pay-stones-from-glass-house

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Obama Open Microphone Slip

President Obama: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space.”
President Medvedev: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…”
President Obama: “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.”
President Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”

Captured by open microphones, President Barack Obama’s private conversation with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Monday in Seoul could have a big negative impact on Mr. Obama’s re-election.
By telling Mr. Medvedev and his patron, the once-and-future Russian President Vladimir Putin, that he will have “flexibility” after the American election on Russian demands opposing a US missile defense for Europe, Mr. Obama is in effect saying he is ready to do something the Russians will like but that the American people won’t.
 
Mr. Obama has shown Russian leaders, and now the entire world, weakness. 
He’s willing to bend to the demands of America’s international rivals as long as his appeasement becomes public only after he’s safely back in the White House for a second term. But he is apparently unwilling to share with the American people his “flexibility” with the Russians, perhaps concerned about the criticism such concessions to Moscow might draw from America’s European allies.
The effects of Mr. Obama’s remarks in Seoul go beyond foreign affairs. If the president believes it is important to his reelection to conceal from Americans his response to Russians demands to halt development of a missile defense for Europe, voters have every right to ask: What other surprises does he plan to spring on us if he’s reelected?
Just as Senator John Kerry’s explanation in 2004 that “I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it” exposed the Massachusetts Senator as a pandering flip-flopper, so may Mr. Obama’s private-turned-public remarks confirm doubts that he’s not shooting straight with the American people. It may also contribute to a belief that he holds voters in thinly disguised contempt.
Is Mr. Obama also concealing unpopular domestic policies he’ll spring on the country in a second term? What the president calls “flexibility” with Russian autocrats, Americans voters will likely view as a lack of candor with them. If that’s the case, it could seriously undermine the president’s chances for reelection.
This won’t all happen by itself. To make the most of Mr. Obama’s statement, Republicans will need to raise it again and again in speeches, ads, videos and debates. After all, Mr. Kerry’s March 2004 remark became an issue only when repeated endlessly in ads and on the stump by the GOP’s surrogates. Then and only then did it become the “a-ha!” moment that shaped perceptions of the Democratic nominee and helped bring about his defeat.

Karl Rove is a former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush. He is a Fox News contributor and author of "Courage and Consequence" (Threshold Editions, 2010).

 

Related Video


President Obama jokes with President Medvedev over the open mic incident.